Costs have also increased because of participants’ strong commitment to answering questions raised during the public comment period about water quality, hydrology and riparian corridor issues.
“We wanted to make sure, as does the Army Corps [of Engineers] that all questions are being answered,” said NISP Participant Chairwoman Kathy Peterson. “It costs additional dollars and is taking additional time, but we believe it’s necessary.”
The participants are committed to analyzing and building an environmentally sustainable project and thoroughly answering questions along the way. A third party is preparing a supplemental report, called an Environmental Impact Statement, for NISP as a way to help answer public questions.
The cost estimate changes were not surprising, because estimates for projects of this magnitude change over time. The participants are maintaining varied longstanding plans to cover these costs.